Cases 151 - 160 of 171
Pierce v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2010cv00285
Plaintiff:
Seavon Pierce
Defendant:
Fernando Gonzales, Director Of Corrections, Mailroom Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Bartz v. Maggie Miller-Stout, et al
as 09-36143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GEORGE BARTZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, INMATE BANKING AND MAILROOM STAFF, JANE DOES and others
Dixon v. HDSP Mailroom Staff et al
as 2:2009cv01712
Plaintiff:
Derek Dixon, II
Defendant:
HDSP Mailroom Staff, Cole Morrow and Jim Henson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Duffey et al
as 1:2009cv00053
Plaintiff:
Tarent Bryant
Defendant:
Terry Dubbey, Marty Allen, Christopher Railey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spence v. Mailroom Staff
as 1:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
James C Spence, Jr
Defendant:
Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sanchez v. Neal Unit Mailroom Staff
as 2:2009cv00024
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Sanchez
Defendant:
Neal Unit Mailroom Staff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Montgomery Akers v. Harrell Watts, et al
as 09-5001
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Montgomery Carl Akers
Defendant - Appellee:
Harrell Watts, Nation Appeals Coordinator, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Michael Nalley, Regional Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, R. Wiley, Warden, US Pentientiary-ADX, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Howe v. Polunsky Unit
as 08-41341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL K HOWE
Defendant - Appellee:
POLUNSKY UNIT MAILROOM STAFF
Bland v. Riverbend State Prison Administration et al
as 3:2008cv00702
Petitioner:
John C. Bland
Respondent:
Riverbend State Prison Administration, Ricky Bell, Unit 3 Staff and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bland v. Riverbend State Prison Administration et al
as 3:2008mc00132
Plaintiff:
John C. Bland
Defendant:
Riverbend State Prison Administration, Ricky Bell, Unit 3 Staff and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
