Cases 151 - 160 of 207
Lopez v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2010cv00690
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lara Lopez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Hughes v. Ayers
as 3:2003cv02666
Petitioner:
Kristin W. Hughes
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Pao v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2010cv00529
Petitioner:
Ge Lor Pao
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pao v. On Habeas Corpus
as 2:2010cv00758
Petitioner:
Ge Lor Pao
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Wong
as 3:2004cv03436
Petitioner:
Gregory Calvin Smith
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center , California Appellate Project , United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and others
Respondent:
Robert K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Terwilligar v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2010cv00383
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Petitioner:
Terrance Terwilligar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Ayers
as 3:1998cv04043
Petitioner:
Willie Darnell Johnson
Miscellaneou:
Habeas Corpus Resource Center and California Appellate Project
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Young v. On Habeas Corpus
as 1:2010cv00276
Petitioner:
Ian A. Young
Respondent:
On Habeas Corpus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mickle v. Brown, et al
as 3:1992cv02951
Plaintiff:
Denny Mickle
Miscellaneou:
California Appellate Project and Habeas Corpus Resource Center
Defendant:
Jill Brown
3rd_party_defendant:
Robert L. Ayers
Respondent:
Robert L. Ayers and Robert K. Wong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
