Cases 151 - 160 of 899
PERRY v. REAGLE
as 1:2021cv02752
Petitioner:
RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Respondent:
DENNIS REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PERRY v. COCHRAN et al
as 1:2021cv02753
Plaintiff:
RODNEY S. PERRY, SR.
Defendant:
RYAN COCHRAN, Q. RUIZ, DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES, SR. v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv06642
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JONES, SR. and GREGORY S. JONES, SR.
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carson v. Neal
as 3:2021cv00807
Plaintiff:
Jamie Carson, Sr
Defendant:
Ronald Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WARDEN FCI TERRA HAUTE
as 2:2021cv00367
Petitioner:
LUSTA JOHNSON, SR
Respondent:
B. LAMMER and MICHAEL CARVAJAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PEACHER, PERRY, POINDEXTER, SMITH v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv02507
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEACHER, RODNEY PERRY, SR., JWAUN POINDEXTER and others
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEACHER, PERRY, POINDEXTER v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv02508
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEACHER, RODNEY PERRY, SR. and JWAUN POINDEXTER
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEACHER, PERRY AND POINDEXTER v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv02510
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEACHER, RODNEY PERRY, SR. and JWAUN POINDEXTER
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEACHER, PERRY, POINDEXTER, SMITH et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2021cv02512
Plaintiff:
ROBERT PEACHER, RODNEY PERRY, SR., JWAUN POINDEXTER and others
Defendant:
D. REAGLE, D. ALSIP, BOLDMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mundy Sr. v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00361
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Mundy Sr.
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Not Classified By Court:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
