Cases 151 - 160 of 511
Jordan Venable v. Jesus Acosta
as 20-15031
Defendant / Appellee:
JESUS ACOSTA
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Baloney et al vs. Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC
as 4:2019cv05029
Plaintiff:
Dwight Richardson, Tommy Merchant, Vernetta Shelvin and others
Defendant:
Intercontinental Terminals Company, LLC and Mitsui & Co. (U.S.A), Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jordan Venable v. Maricopa County Justice Courts, et al
as 19-17589
Defendant / Appellee:
DREAMY DRAW JUSTICE COURT, MCDOWELL MOUNTAIN JUSTICE COURT, MARICOPA COUNTY JUSTICE COURTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Collier et al v. Stabus et al (PLR3)
as 2:2019cv00231
Defendant:
Samuel Jones, Andrew Cross, Joe Herron and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Collier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan Venable v. Maricopa Cou. Sheriff's Office, et al
as 19-17588
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY 4TH AVENUE JAIL and MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Jordan Venable v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Offi, et al
as 19-17595
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY 4TH AVENUE JAIL and MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Jordan Venable v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 19-17590
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX and UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as Paramedics Phoenix
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Jordan Venable v. Glendale Police Department, et al
as 19-17594
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Defendant / Appellee:
UNKNOWN PARTIES, Unknown Officers and GLENDALE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv10950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Jordan Venable v. Maricopa County Burn Center
as 19-17593
Defendant / Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY BURN CENTER
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JORDAN DUKE VENABLE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
