Cases 151 - 160 of 4,558
Anthony Mungin v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13616
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY MUNGIN
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL
Kenneth Eugene Smith v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections
as 22-13846
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KENNETH EUGENE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Jackson v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
as 3:2022cv01119
Petitioner:
Kim Jackson
Respondent:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pizzuto v. Richardson
as 1:2022cv00452
Petitioner:
Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr
Defendant:
Warden Tim Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nicholas Bernard Acklin v. Commissioner, Alabama Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-13599
Petitioner / Appellant:
NICHOLAS BERNARD ACKLIN
Respondent / Appellee:
COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HOLMAN CF WARDEN
Roland Davis v. Warden Ohio State Penitentiary
as 22-3978
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROLAND DAVIS
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN, OHIO STATE PENITENTIARY
Goode v. Farris
as 4:2022cv00508
Petitioner:
Clarence Rozell Goode, Jr
Respondent:
Jim Farris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barbee v. Collier
as 22-70011
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Stephen Dale Barbee
Defendant / Appellant:
Bryan Collier, Bobby Lumpkin and Dennis Crowley
Ovante v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02003
Petitioner:
Manuel Ovante
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Robert Wharton v. Superintendent Graterford SCI, et al
as 22-2839
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROBERT WHARTON, PADRP
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT GRATERFORD SCI
Defendant / Appellant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA, PAUL M. GEORGE and NANCY WINKELMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
