Cases 161 - 170 of 213
LeRoy Shannon v. John Evans
as 09-3128
Petitioner - Appellant:
LEROY SHANNON
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden
Redmond v. Evans et al
as 3:2009cv00606
Plaintiff:
Anthony Redmond
Defendant:
John Evans, John Hiloaoid, John Peyton and others
Cause Of Action: M
Ginx, Inc. et al v. Soho Alliance et al
as 1:2009cv06977
Plaintiff:
Ginx, Inc., Gayle Patrick-Odeen and Tom Odeen
Defendant:
Soho Alliance, New York State Liquor Authority, Daniel B. Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Evans v. Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00142
Plaintiff:
John Evans
Defendant:
Portfolio Recovery Associates LLC and Routh Crabtree, APC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hamilton v. Issac et al
as 3:2009cv00359
Petitioner:
Kevin Hamilton
Defendant:
Debbie Issac, John Shepard, John Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grayson v. Evans et al
as 3:2009cv00335
Plaintiff:
Omar Grayson
Defendant:
John Evans, William Payton, William Hilliard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carl Grant v. John Evans, et al
as 09-2097
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL LEE GRANT
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden, JULIUS FLAGG, Assistant Warden, BILL PICKERING, Major and others
David Ruttenberg v. Frank Jones
as 09-1438
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. RUTTENBERG, JUDITH G. RUTTENBERG and TRIPLE D ENTERPRISES, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
FRANK JONES, Mayor of Manassas Park, Virginia in his official and individual capacities, JOHN EVANS, Chief of Police of Manassas Park, Virginia, in his official and individual capacities, DETECTIVE L, Manassas Park Police Detective, in his official and individual capacities and others
Defendant:
THOMAS L. KIFER, in his official and individual capacities
Robert Crump v. John Evans
as 09-1947
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT A. CRUMP
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN EVANS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
