Cases 171 - 180 of 231
Wadsworth v. Valdez et al
as 3:2010cv00219
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lynn Wadsworth
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, Unknown Doctor, Zia Rehman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fletcher v. Valdez
as 3:2009cv02435
Petitioner:
Henry Earl Fletcher
Respondent:
Lupe Valdez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Mitchell v. Lupe Valdez
as 09-11147
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT WAYNE MITCHELL
Respondent - Appellee:
LUPE VALDEZ
Clayton v. Garland Police Department et al
as 3:2009cv02048
Plaintiff:
Freddie Lee Clayton
Defendant:
Garland Police Department, B. N. Worsham, NFN Hatfield and others
Amicu:
Craig Watkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruston v. Board of County Commissioners, et al
as 09-2340
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LESTER JON RUSTON
Defendant - Appellee:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, LUPE VALDEZ and JIM BOWLES
Ronald Pearson v. Eric Holder, et al
as 09-10808
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. PEARSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC HOLDER, United States Attorney General, GREG ABBOTT, Attorney General for the State of Texas, LUPE VALDEZ, Sheriff for Dallas County, Texas and others
Johnson v. Valdez et al
as 3:2009cv01446
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, John Vance, Hugh Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Valdez et al
as 4:2009cv02320
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Johnson
Defendant:
Lupe Valdez, John Vance, Hugh Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dallas County Jail et al
as 3:2009cv00737
Plaintiff:
Brenson Dudley Smith
Defendant:
Dallas County Jail, Lupe Valdez, NFN Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Holder et al
as 3:2009cv00682
Plaintiff:
Ronald C Pearson
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Jane J. Boyle, Greg Abbott and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
