Cases 181 - 190 of 332,398
Bonilla v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Marisol Bonilla
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration and United States Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Church v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 1:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Debra Church
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Zepeda v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03479
Plaintiff:
Miguel Zepeda
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Likes v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Maria A. Likes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
BEAUCHAMP v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
as 1:2024cv00743
Plaintiff:
KELLEY M BEAUCHAMP
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Thao v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01554
Plaintiff:
Reagies Thao
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elliott v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
CARR v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv05746
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M CARR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beekman v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00590
Plaintiff:
Ashley N Beekman
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Romanyk v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00576
Plaintiff:
Christopher Peter Romanyk
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
