Cases 11 - 20 of 33,072
MARCHISOTTO v. SANCHEZ et al
as 1:2024cv05870
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fontana v. Dempsey et al
as 1:2024cv00544
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fontana
Defendant:
Sgt. Dempsey, New Castle City Police Station, Phlebotomist and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boone v. Brandon
as 1:2024cv00548
Plaintiff:
Leondre J Boone
Defendant:
Triantos Brandon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dallas v. Assenmacher et al
as 2:2024cv01882
Plaintiff:
Joslyn Dallas
Defendant:
Officer Thomas Assenmacher, Officer MICHAEL SYLVESTER, Sergeant Brandon Maxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cole v. Erie Rise Leadership Academy Charter School
as 1:2024cv00119
Plaintiff:
Diana Cole
Defendant:
Erie Rise Leadership Academy Charter School
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
BEY v. SCHAEFER
as 2:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
MELLONZO BEY
Defendant:
JENNIFER SCHAEFER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
Calloway v Department of Health, et al
as 1:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Jesse Calloway, IV
Defendant:
Department of Health, Division of Vital Records and Lisa L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whaley v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, County of Dauphin et al
as 1:2024cv00742
Plaintiff:
George H. Whaley, Jr.
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, County of Dauphin and Officer Natalie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heon Yoo v. Brian Barker, et al
as 24-1833
Plaintiff:
HEON JONG YOO, Agent of Hank Yoo
Defendant:
BRIAN BARKER, ASMA NISSAR, CARRIER CLINIC PSYCHIATRISTS and others
Elmer Daniels v. City of Wilmington, et al
as 24-1808
Plaintiff:
ELMER DANIELS
Defendant:
CITY OF WILMINGTON and PHILLIP A. SAGGIONE, Esq.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
