Cases 11 - 20 of 84,948
RIZK v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv05590
Petitioner:
WISAM RIZK
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JACOBS v. ZAKEN
as 2:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JACOBS
Defendant:
MICHAEL ZAKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. The Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 3:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Michael Greene
Defendant:
The Parole Board Of The Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SARRO v. WARDEN THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05577
Petitioner:
BRIAN SARRO
Respondent:
WARDEN THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
ANTHONY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00116
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A. ANTHONY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Edgardo Rivera v. Superintendent Dallas SCI, et al
as 24-1750
Plaintiff:
EDGARDO SOBRADO RIVERA
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT DALLAS SCI and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Jasper Frazier v. Victoria Kuhn, et al
as 24-1736
Plaintiff:
JASPER FRAZIER
Defendant:
VICTORIA L. KUHN, Acting Commissioner, PATRICK NOGAN, Administrator, ANTHONY GONGI, Association Administrator and others
Fry v. Rash et al
as 1:2024cv00510
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Fry
Defendant:
State Trooper Cpl. Gregory Rash, D.A.G Isaac Rank, D.A.G. James Betts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lacombe v. James T. Vaughn Correctional Center et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Claude P. Lacombe
Defendant:
James T. Vaughn Correctional Center, Warden and Medical Provider
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAKER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv05517
Petitioner:
JONATHAN P. BAKER
Respondent:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
