Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Valentini v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00936
Plaintiff:
Rick Valentini
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ibarra, Unknown Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cromwell v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00783
Petitioner:
Robert Louis Cromwell
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Yokois v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00619
Plaintiff:
Douglas D Yokois
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Larry Gann, Staci Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentini v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00325
Plaintiff:
Rick Wayne Valentini
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Ibarra, Unknown Evans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ibarra v. 13 Custom Cabinets LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00079
Plaintiff:
Luis Ibarra
Defendant:
13 Custom Cabinets LLC, Frank Amavizca and Unknown Amavizca
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Ogle v. Thornell et al
as 2:2023cv00200
Petitioner:
Jessie Paul Ogle
Respondent:
Ryan Thornell, Staci Ibarra and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anderson v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08023
Petitioner:
Frank Winfield Anderson
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Mecham #157752 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02077
Plaintiff:
Cade J Mecham
Defendant:
David Shinn, Larry Gann, Stacey Fife and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ovante v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02003
Petitioner:
Manuel Ovante
Respondent:
David Shinn and Staci Ibarra
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Hooper v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01935
Petitioner:
Murray Hooper
Respondent:
David Shinn, Staci Ibarra and Rodney Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Ptn for Writ of H/C - Stay of Execution
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
