Cases 11 - 20 of 43
Bittle v. North Carolina Division of Employment Security
as 3:2022cv00628
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
North Carolina Division of Employment Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2022cv00873
Petitioner:
JARVIS LAMONT PATE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Bittle v. Go Tires & Auto Repair LLC
as 3:2022cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Go Tires & Auto Repair LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. Atrium Health Behavioral
as 3:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Atrium Health Behavioral
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. N.C. Unemployment Division Pandemic
as 3:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
N.C. Unemployment Division Pandemic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bittle v. El Owl
as 3:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Bernard Bittle
Defendant:
Sigis El OWL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
PATE v. USA
as 1:2022cv00454
Petitioner:
JARVIS LAMONT PATE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
JARVIS v. GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2021cv00875
Plaintiff:
VICTOR KEON JARVIS
Defendant:
GUILFORD COUNTY NORTH CAROLINA and DANNY ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
GORDON et al v PHILLIP et al
as 1:2021cv00029
Defendant:
LAWRENCE HARRIS, III, JARVIS ADDISON, VICTOR A. SUAREZ MELENDEZ and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ELLERSHAW, TRAVIS GORDON and FTP INVESTMENTS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22
Jarvis Painting, Inc. v. The Imprint Church et al
as 7:2020cv00160
Defendant:
Tyler Jernigan, The Imprint Church, Lisa Cavanaugh and others
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Painting, Inc. d/b/a Jarvis Property Restoration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
