Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Lee v. Krom et al
as 1:2017cv00338
Plaintiff:
Donovon N. Lee, Joyce E. Lee, Duncan M. Lee and others
Defendant:
Angela Krom, Jerimiah Zook, Lauren Sulcove and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUANG v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00740
Plaintiff:
JIANMIN HUANG
Defendant:
INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JOSE CARMONA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
PEPICELLI v. INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv00341
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY PEPICELLI
Defendant:
INNOCOLL HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY, ANTHONY P. ZOOK, JOSE CARMONA and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
JORDAN v. WETZEL et al
as 1:2016cv00307
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, MICHEAL D. OVERMYER, SARAH SIEGEL and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID V. JORDAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nealman v. Laughlin et al
as 1:2015cv01579
Plaintiff:
Tawna Z. Nealman
Defendant:
Ryan P. Laughlin, Robert Maben, Christian Z. Snook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zook v. Colvin
as 3:2015cv01078
Plaintiff:
Doreen J. Zook
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Norton v. United States et al
as 1:2014cv02374
Plaintiff:
Darnell Norton
Defendant:
United States, U. S. Bureau of Prisons Staff at Lewisburg SMU, REC Officer #1 (NU) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BROWN v. MAIDPRO COLLEGEVILLE et al
as 2:2013cv02813
Plaintiff:
JACLYNE BROWN
Defendant:
MAIDPRO COLLEGEVILLE, ZOOK INDUSTRIES, L.L.C. and MAIDPRO, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Zook v. Zapatocky et al
as 3:2012cv01425
Plaintiff:
David Zook
Defendant:
David Zapatocky , David Coffman , Jason Zola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Njos v. Kane et al
as 3:2012cv01252
Plaintiff:
Scott Njos
Defendant:
Thomas R. Kane, Doe 1 and 2, Romig and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
