Cases 11 - 20 of 103
NOWELL v. CROW et al
as 4:2021cv00068
Respondent:
Warden JOHN CROW, III, MUSCOGEE CIRCUIT COURT and STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner:
ANDY NOWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00295
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Telecom Fiber, LLC v. Mulroney et al
as 1:2020cv03907
Defendant:
Jared Redmond Charles, Ernest Jacob Crowe, George Bruce Mulroney and others
Plaintiff:
Telecom Fiber, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
I. v. Barrow County Board of Education et al
as 2:2020cv00087
Defendant:
Tonya R. Crowe, Barrow County Board of Education, Keith B. Crowe and others
Plaintiff:
J. I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04955
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
EVANS v. CROWE & MULVEY LLP et al
as 3:2019cv00069
Defendant:
FLORENCE CAREY, CROWE & MULVEY LLP and ELIZABETH MULVEY
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EVANS v. CROWE & MULVEY LLP et al
as 3:2019cv00068
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, PHIL CROWE, FLORENCE CAREY and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EVANS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crow v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2019cv00085
Defendant:
Cyprus Amax Minerals Company, PTI Royston, LLC, Johnson & Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. City of Cartersville et al
as 4:2019cv00045
Plaintiff:
Daidron Williams, Eutychus Wilson, Aaron Conelly and others
Defendant:
Cullen LaFrance, Joshua Coker, Mark Mayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. 2 For 1, LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00047
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc., Full Volume Music, Da Crippler Publishing and others
Defendant:
Jolynn Romano, Larry Nelson, II, 2 For 1, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
