Cases 11 - 20 of 4,721
Trejo-Munoz v. USA
as 5:2024cv00134
Petitioner:
Eduardo Trejo-Munoz
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00618
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04234
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Figueroa-Quintana et al v. Restrepo-Munoz
as 3:2024cv01226
Plaintiff:
Pedro J. Figueroa Quintana and Una Vision Quintana,Inc.
Defendant:
Daniel Felipe Restrepo Munoz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Munoz v. Madrid et al
as 5:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Javier Munoz
Defendant:
Dominic Madrid and Hector Solis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Munoz v. Cueto
as 5:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Adrian Munoz
Defendant:
Warden Emundo Cueto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Munoz, Sr. v. Cueto
as 5:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Munoz, Sr.
Defendant:
Warden Emundo Cueto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harrison v. Birtwell et al
as 2:2024cv01413
Plaintiff:
Michael David Harrison
Defendant:
Birtwell, Moore, Bailey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
P. et al v. Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv02828
Plaintiff:
D.P.U, D. M. P., Annie Pompa Morejon and others
Defendant:
Beech-Nut Nutrition Company, Inc., Gerber Products Company, Plum PBC doing business as Plum Organics and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
White v. Howard County Sheriffs Office et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Jim Bob White
Defendant:
Howard County Sheriffs Office, Simon Munoz, John Doe 1:24-cv-00069 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
