Cases 11 - 20 of 94
Burns v. Treehouse
as 2:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Jamie Burns
Defendant:
Treehouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Chan v. Ryan et al
as 2:2022cv01796
Plaintiff:
Joseph Chan
Defendant:
Michael Ryan, Larry Brouse, Saint James Cathedral and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Newcomb v. Kijakazi
as 2:2022cv00257
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rae Newcomb and Jessica Rae Burns
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Perri v. Burns et al
as 3:2022cv05739
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Perri, Apollo and Son
Defendant:
William Burns, John W Raymond, Bill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burns v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv05272
Plaintiff:
David Burns
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Nisley v. Asotin County Jail Washington et al
as 2:2021cv00346
Plaintiff:
Martin P Nisley, Jr
Defendant:
Asotin County Jail Washington, Benjamin C Nichols, Curt L Liedkie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington Election Integrity Coalition United et al v. Fell et al
as 2:2021cv01354
Plaintiff:
Washington Election Integrity Coaltion United, Arthur Coday, Jr., Thomas J Prettyman and others
Defendant:
Snohomish County, Garth Fell and Does 1-30
Intervenor Defendant:
Washington State Democratic Central Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sabon v. King County et al
as 2:2021cv01251
Plaintiff:
Ivan Patrick Sabon
Defendant:
King County, Seattle Municipal, David Koenig and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01555
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
