Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Joyner v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
as 4:2016cv04073
Plaintiff:
Rusty E. Joyner
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction, Arkansas Community Correction, Medical Services Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner v. Nevada County, AR , et al
as 6:2015cv06107
Plaintiff:
Ivory Joyner
Defendant:
Nevada County, AR and Hot Spring County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner v. Does et al
as 4:2015cv00595
Plaintiff:
Ivory Joyner
Defendant:
Does and Hot Spring County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Viele et al v. Peters et al
as 4:2015cv00503
Plaintiff:
David Viele , Beth Viele and Beth's Bail Bonds Inc
Defendant:
Larry E Peters , Arkansas Professional Bail Bondsman Licensing Board , Curt Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Joyner v. Overton et al
as 6:2015cv06029
Plaintiff:
Rusty Joyner
Defendant:
Shelly Overton, Courtney Thomas, Tina Latture and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner v. Overton et al
as 4:2015cv00163
Plaintiff:
Rusty Joyner
Defendant:
Shelly Overton, Courtney Thomas, Tina Latture and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joyner-Clarke v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00005
Plaintiff:
Sharon R Joyner-Clarke
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Ventramo v. Joyner et al
as 4:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Susan Ventramo
Defendant:
Karen Joyner and Little Rock Home Health Agency Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Joyner v. Donaldson et al
as 5:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Joyner, III
Defendant:
Jamie Donaldson and Reggie Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Norris et al
as 5:2007cv00041
Plaintiff:
Jerry J Ellis
Defendant:
L Norris, R Hobbs, G Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
