Cases 11 - 20 of 2,415
Reid et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv04053
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Lashaunda Reid, Erika Rexrode, Dennis Robinett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Montoya Gomez v. Garland
as 24-3242
Petitioner:
JOSE LUIS MONTOYA GOMEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Thinn v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01470
Plaintiff:
Montoya Thinn
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jimenez Montoya v. Garland
as 24-3132
Petitioner:
CARLOS JAVIER JIMENEZ MONTOYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
GUTIERREZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00800
Petitioner:
OCTAVIO MOJICA GUTIERREZ and CHRISTOPHER MONTOYA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Carias et al v. Long Fence Company, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv01380
Plaintiff:
Esvin Carias, Sergio Flores Grajales, Marco Antonio Hernandez Saldana and others
Defendant:
Long Fence Company, Inc. and E&J General Construction Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Montoya-Landaverde, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2923
Petitioner:
LUZ ELENA MONTOYA-LANDAVERDE, JOSE ADONAY ORTIZ-MONTOYA and JOSE EMMANUEL ORTIZ-MONTOYA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Hedman et al v. Montoya et al
as 5:2024cv00612
Plaintiff:
Tracy Hedman, Malinda McMahon and James Montoya
Defendant:
Fat Dough Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
