Cases 11 - 20 of 679
Robinson v. Landerth et al
as 4:2024cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kendrick A Robinson
Defendant:
G Landerth, P Vanlandingham, Lakita Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Emrit v. Combs et al
as 5:2024cv05056
Defendant:
Sean Combs, P. Diddy, Bad Boy Entertainment and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv04021
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney David P. Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Warden Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicapped
Washington v. Cotten et al
as 4:2024cv00207
Plaintiff:
Jerome Edward Washington
Defendant:
David P Cotten, Jason Mitchell, Jeffie Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harvey v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Aubrey P Harvey
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Stinson v. Yates et al
as 2:2023cv00240
Plaintiff:
Mark T Stinson
Defendant:
John P Yates, Blair, Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Owens v. USA
as 4:2023cv00964
Plaintiff:
Joe P Owens
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Thayer v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02117
Plaintiff:
Scott P. Thayer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
