Cases 11 - 20 of 73
Cahill v. Red Clay Technology Group Inc et al
as 2:2021cv00990
Plaintiff:
Chris Cahill
Defendant:
Red Clay Technology Group Inc, Rayburn C Washburn, Jr and Damon Porrill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Stewart et al v. Red Mountain Retail Inc
as 2:2021cv00989
Plaintiff:
Patricia Stewart and Larry Luckey
Defendant:
Red Mountain Retail Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Murphree v. Sheffield Light & Power Co et al
as 3:2021cv00901
Defendant:
Sheffield Utilities, Red River Specialties Inc, Monsanto Company and others
Plaintiff:
Maragret Ann Murphree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00191
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01820
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hayes et al v. Monsanto Company Corporation et al
as 3:2020cv01736
Defendant:
Monsanto Company Corporation, Sheffield Utilities, Red River Specialties Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Katrina Hayes and Michael Randy Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Chiarizio v. Murrill et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2020cv00582
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Karla Walker Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Chiarizio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Redding et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00367
Defendant:
Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rachel Redding and Jeff Redding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00464
Defendant:
Charles Tipton, Alabama Department of Corrections, Kay Ivey and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
