Cases 11 - 20 of 256
Johnston v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Christopher Alan Johnston
Defendant:
FCI Mcdowell Dental Service, Doc. Veronica Brown, Asst. Megan Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Scott v. McCauley
as 2:2023cv00001
Plaintiff:
Johnny Alan Scott, Jr.
Defendant:
Angel McCauley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stewart v. Reichard et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Brian Stewart
Defendant:
Timothy Reichard, Michele Stewart, Rodney Alan Stewart, Sr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Myers v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
David Alan Myers
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hicks v. May et al
as 2:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Alan L. Hicks
Defendant:
Sandra May, Pamela Givens, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nickoson v. Trent et al
as 3:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Nickoson
Defendant:
George Trent, Rachael Baumgardner, Alan Barnett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Alan Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hicks v. Ames
as 2:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Alan L. Hicks
Defendant:
Donnie Ames
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks v. Ames
as 3:2021cv00618
Petitioner:
Alan L. Hicks and Alan Lane Hicks
Respondent:
Donnie Ames
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Mullins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv00128
Plaintiff:
Rochelle Alane Mullins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
