Cases 11 - 20 of 30,682
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00867
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO and Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Painters Loca v. National Drywall Inc.
as 1:2024cv03690
Petitioner:
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO and Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Painters Loca
Respondent:
National Drywall Inc. a/k/a National Drywall Interior's Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO and Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Painters Loca v. Nova Brothers, Inc.
as 1:2024cv03689
Petitioner:
Drywall Tapers and Pointers of Greater New York Local Union 1974, Affiliated with International Union of Allied Painters and Allied Trades, AFL-CIO and Trustees of the Drywall Tapers and Painters Loca
Respondent:
Nova Brothers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9 Motion to Confirm Arbitration Award
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00902
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund et al v. The Parkchester South Condominium, Inc.
as 7:2024cv03711
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Insurance Fund, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Painting Industry Annuity Fund, Trustees of the District Council No. 9 Finishing Trades Institute and others
Defendant:
The Parkchester South Condominium, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Employee Painters' Trust et al v. Alaska Glazing Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Employee Painters' Trust, International Painters and Allied Trades Industry Pension Fund, Finishing Trades Institute and others
Defendant:
Alaska Glazing, Inc. and Michael E Merrill
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Goldman Jewelz, Inc. dba Jewelz v. Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 5:2024cv00482
Plaintiff:
Goldman Jewelz, Inc. doing business as Jewelz
Defendant:
Allied Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE et al v. ROSEMA CORPORATION, AN INDIANA DOMESTIC FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION
as 1:2024cv00798
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN KNOWLES, TRUSTEE, BRICKLAYERS OF INDIANA RETIREMENT PLAN, BRICKLAYERS & TROWEL TRADES INTERNATIONAL PENSION FUND, BRICKLAYERS & ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS, INTERNATIONAL HEALTH FUND, BAC 4 IN/KY APPRENTICESHIP & TRAINING PROGRAM, INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 4 OF INDIANA & KENTUCKY, and others
Defendant:
ROSEMA CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Welfare Fund et al v. Wm. Erath & Son, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03451
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Welfare Fund, Trustees of the Local 7 Tile Industry Annuity Fund, Trustees of the Tile Layers Local Union 52 Pension Fund and others
Defendant:
Wm. Erath & Son, Inc. and Neureise Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
US Foods, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union No. 87 et al
as 2:2024cv03949
Plaintiff:
US Foods, Inc. and U.S. Foodservice, Inc.
Defendant:
INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 87, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 542, INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF TEAMSTERS LOCAL UNION NO. 630 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 151 Labor: Review of Agency Action
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
