Cases 11 - 20 of 3,232
Young v. Woodards et al
as 3:2024cv05704
Defendant:
Wayne Yu, Victoria Woodards, Avery Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Andre Brigham Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Li v. Kelly
as 1:2024cv05764
Defendant:
Judge Peter J. Kelly
Plaintiff:
Yu Chan Li
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Syctime LLC et al v. Porsche Cars North America, Inc.
as 2:2024cv07033
Defendant:
Does 1-100, inclusive, Porsche Cars North America, Inc. and Porsche Irvine
Plaintiff:
Yu-Chen Su, Does 1-100 inclusive and Syctime LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv07007
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
SHEEN et al v. GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv02400
Plaintiff:
FUNG I YUAN, TZU-KUAN LIN, YI-PEI SHIH and others
Defendant:
GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
v. In Re Naturalization Ceremony 08/27/24
as 3:2024mc80210
Unknown:
Margarita Bamaca Domingo, Shagufta Nadeem, Florence Han and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv06840
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv04990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Ketchens et al v. Robinson
as 1:2024cv00244
Plaintiff:
Gretchen H. Ketchens and Charles Donald Ketchens
Defendant:
Faith Yu-Ing Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
