Cases 11 - 20 of 112
Arnold v. The United States of America
as 7:2023cv01163
Plaintiff:
Edward Arnold
Defendant:
The United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disability Act
Arnold v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00610
Plaintiff:
Anthony Arnold
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Arnold v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2023hc02014
Petitioner:
Zachary Stewart Arnold
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Arnold v. USA
as 3:2022cv00436
Petitioner:
Curtis Arnold
Respondent:
USA
Interested Party:
USA2255Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Thomas v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03297
Plaintiff:
Arnold J. Thomas
Defendant:
Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson et al v. Hardee et al
as 5:2022ct03244
Plaintiff:
Travis L. Watson, Samuel McCrae, III, Leonzo L. White and others
Defendant:
Michael A. Hardee, Unit Management, Food Service Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WNC Citizens for Equality, Inc. v. City of Asheville et al
as 1:2021cv00310
Plaintiff:
WNC Citizens for Equality, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Asheville, Debra Campbell, The Asheville City Schools Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arnold v. Slagle
as 5:2021cv00140
Petitioner:
James Ray Arnold
Respondent:
Mike Slagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Arnold et al v. Tradewind Flight Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gauthier Kabengele, Matthew Lambert, Thomas DeBatt and others
Defendant:
Darryl Centanni, Wally Calabrese, Onvoi, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
