Cases 11 - 20 of 122
Mendy v. Morrison et al
as 2:2022cv00569
Plaintiff:
Edward Bissau Mendy
Defendant:
James McKenzie Morrison, Kevin Lightburn, Roy Jones, Jr and others
Abul-Qasim v. Pal et al
as 8:2022cv00761
Plaintiff:
Rafiq Abul-Qasim
Defendant:
Ram Pal and GGS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Removal - Motor Vehicle
IOU Central Inc. v. Total Plant Management Group Inc. et al
as 4:2022cv00837
Plaintiff:
IOU Central Inc. d/b/a IOU Financial Inc. and IOU Central Inc. doing business as IOU Financial Inc.
Defendant:
Total Plant Management Group Inc., Sam and Sab Inc., Meherun N. Ahmed and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Refaat Abul Hosn v. Fly Baghdad Airline
as 21-1806
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REFAAT F. ABUL HOSN
Defendant / Appellee:
FLY BAGHDAD AIRLINE
Garcia et al v. Three Buddy's Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06142
Plaintiff:
Liliana Garcia and Araceli Garcia
Defendant:
Three Buddy's Inc. d/b/a Pita Olive and, Abul Kamal Pasha and Three Buddy's Inc. doing business as Pita Olive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05509
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02470
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701
Bashar v. Garland
as 21-6324
Petitioner:
MOHAMMAD ABUL BASHAR
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Bhuiyan v. Texas Service Center et al
as 1:2021cv02570
Plaintiff:
Abul Khair Bhuiyan
Respondent:
Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Acting Director Tracy Renaud, Texas Service Center and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
