Cases 11 - 20 of 77
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2021cv03289
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCAPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Jones
as 21-50857
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Patrick Alexander Jones
Jones v. Headley et al
as 7:2021cv00997
Petitioner:
Marcus Alexander Jones
Respondent:
Joseph H Headley and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21167
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC ALEXANDER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95500
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horizon Christian School et al v. State of Oregon
as 3:2020cv01345
Defendant:
State of Oregon
Plaintiff:
Horizon Christian School, Life Christian School, McMinnville Christian Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv71039
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv37371
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75865
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv56377
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER JONES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
