Cases 11 - 20 of 600
Almeida v. Localize City Inc.
as 1:2024cv01948
Plaintiff:
David Almeida
Defendant:
Localize City Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Joao Batista Dos Santos, et al v. U.S. Attorney General
as 24-10601
Petitioner:
JOAO BATISTA DOS SANTOS, IRENE GONCALVES DE ALMEIDA and RAFAELA GONCALVES DOS SANTOS
Respondent:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Borges De Almeida, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1060
Petitioner:
MARCOS AURELIO BORGES DE ALMEIDA, HELEN DAHER DA SILVA and ENZO DAHER DE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Almeida v. FCI Berlin, Warden
as 1:2024cv00044
Petitioner:
Carlos Espinal Almeida
Respondent:
FCI Berlin, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
ALMEIDA v. Target Corporation, a Foreign Profit Corporation
as 8:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Cristiane Almeida
Defendant:
Target Corporation
Other:
Stacy Estes Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Gomes De Almeida, et al. v. Garland
as 24-731
Petitioner:
GILLIARD GOMES DE ALMEIDA, ADENISA RODRIGUES SABARA DOS SANTOS and MAIANY GIULLY RODRIGUES DE ALMEIDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Almeida-Barreto v. Warden, F.C.I. Jesup
as 2:2024cv00017
Petitioner:
Marco Ian Almeida-Barreto
Respondent:
Warden, F.C.I. Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STEVEN JAMES ALMEIDA, Chosen: CASSANDRA ALMEIDA v. CENTURION et al
as 1:2023cv02227
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JAMES ALMEIDA, Chosen: CASSANDRA ALMEIDA
Defendant:
CENTURION, VERDEN, MAYS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
