Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00922
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1158
Shraddha Patel v. Kirit Patel
as 18-1022
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHRADDHA PATEL
Defendant - Appellee:
KIRIT PATEL, a/k/a Kiritkumar Ambalal Patel, KRUPA PATEL, ATUL PATEL, a/k/a Atulkumar Ambalal Patel, a/k/a Atulkumar Arvindbhai Patel and others
Defendant:
PRABUDAS AMBALAL PATEL, NISHA PATEL, a/k/a Nisha Prabudas Patel, MANU PATEL and others
Atain Specialty Insurance Company v. Sai Darshan Corp. d/b/a America's Best Value Inn et al
as 4:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Atain Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sai Darshan Corp. d/b/a America's Best Value Inn , Arvindbhai Patel , Vantage Hospitality Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
PATEL et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00542
Plaintiff:
AJAY HARSHADBHAI PATEL , JALPA ARVINDBHAI PATEL and VIRGO, INC.
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, LEON RODRIGUEZ, MARK J HAZUDA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00553
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC. v. SAI, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv01867
Plaintiff:
DAYS INNS WORLDWIDE, INC.
Defendant:
SAI, LLC, ARVINDBHAI PATEL, NAYANABEN PATEL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
PATEL et al v. ZHU
as 2:2013cv00231
Plaintiff:
ARVINDBHAI PATEL and JAYSHREE PATEL
Defendant:
SONGDE ZHU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tusharbhai Patel v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 11-3588
Petitioner:
TUSHARBHAI ARVINDBHAI PATEL, aka Tushar A. Patel
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General
Patel v. Janket
as 3:2007cv01268
Plaintiff:
Arvindbhai Patel
Defendant:
Michael L. Janket
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
