Cases 11 - 20 of 45
WOOD v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv05197
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN RAY WOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ARMER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv04657
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN RAY ARMER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. USA
as 1:2020cv00329
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Austin Ray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ABOOD et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03373
Plaintiff:
DAVID AKIN, JONATHAN L. ANDERSON, RONALD BAILEY and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WALSH et al v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv03282
Plaintiff:
STEVEN YINGER, KAREN WILSON, NEIL WHITT and others
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, 3M COMPANY, DOES 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Walsh et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02223
Plaintiff:
Steven Yinger, Karen Wilson, Neil Whitt and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Aearo Holdings, LLC and others
Abood et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2019cv02186
Plaintiff:
David Akin, Jonathan L. Anderson, Wesley Barnhouse and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Daniel II Joseph Barlow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Carpenter v. Davis
as 1:2019cv00025
Plaintiff:
Mr, Austin Ray Carpenter
Respondent:
Balden Polk, Bryan Collier and Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Undetermined:
Executive Director Bryan Collier
Petitioner:
Austin Ray Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Carpenter v. Collier
as 6:2019cv00013
Respondent:
Bryan Collier, Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Balden Polk
Petitioner:
Austin Ray Carpenter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Slaughter v. Goodwin
as 5:2018cv00730
Plaintiff:
Austin Ray Slaughter
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
