Cases 11 - 20 of 226
Maxwell v. Lane et al
as 2:2023cv00237
Plaintiff:
Roderick D Maxwell
Defendant:
Stephan Lane, Tyrone Allison, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Geddings v. Criner et al
as 4:2023cv01083
Plaintiff:
Robert Geddings
Defendant:
Blake Criner, Arkansas Department of Correction and Todd Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBee v. Battle et al
as 4:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Tatyana Lashelle McBee
Defendant:
Corwin Battle, John Rhone, Blake Eudy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas et al
as 2:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
Blake Jones
Defendant:
Siloam Springs, Arkansas, Benton County, Allan Gilbert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Norwood v. Payne et al
as 4:2023cv00823
Plaintiff:
Jake Lynn Norwood
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Kenny Bolden, RD Williamson Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barefield v. Rondoni et al
as 6:2023cv06094
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Sgt. Oscar Rondoni, Program Warden Tasha Griffin, Deputy Warden Randy Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
De Mario Blake Griffin
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Carrier v. Junod et al
as 5:2023cv05133
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mark Carrier
Defendant:
CEO Flint Junod, Head Nurse Tracey Robison, Sheriff Shawn Holloway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuel v. Sweets et al
as 4:2023cv00749
Plaintiff:
Timothy J Samuel
Defendant:
Rowdy Sweet, Blake Wilson, Rowdy Sweets and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. Blake
as 4:2023cv00732
Plaintiff:
Tony Anthony Griffin
Defendant:
Janice Blake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
