Cases 11 - 20 of 142
United States of America v. Boothe
as 1:2021cv00637
Defendant:
Stephanie L. Boothe
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1471
JOHNSON v. HILL et al
as 2:2021cv00300
Defendant:
THORNTON, CT. COLLINS, KYLE MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RELIABLE PHARMACY et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S. INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06291
Defendant:
JAMES "JIM" GRAUSO, SANDOZ, INC., Mitchell Blashinsky and others
Plaintiff:
CHET JOHNSON DRUG, INC., RELIABLE PHARMACY, INC., RUSSELL'S MR. DISCOUNT DRUGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
COWEY et al v. MULLEN et al
as 2:2020cv01845
Defendant:
COL. ROBERT EVANCHICK, SHERIFF WILLIAM MULLEN and COUNTY OF ALLEGHENY, PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., EMILY COWEY, CHELSEA SCHMIDT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOOTH v. MUTUAL OF OMAHA
as 2:2020cv01697
Plaintiff:
ANDREW BOOTH
Defendant:
MUTUAL OF OMAHA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
GOK v. POST & SCHELL PC et al
as 2:2020cv04968
Defendant:
JUSTIN SWIDLER, DEREK SMITH LAW GROUP, PLLC, MATTHEW WEISBERG and others
Plaintiff:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01327
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Booth v. Saul
as 3:2020cv01395
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Plaintiff:
Sandra Michelle Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brett v. D'Andrea et al
as 1:2020cv01398
Defendant:
Shortly Blueh, Chrystal Brown, Barry Mighr and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Brett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Connecticut et al v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv03539
Plaintiff:
State of New Mexico, State of Missouri, Commonwealth (of) Pennsylvania and others
Defendant:
MALLINCKRODT PLC, ACTAVIS ELIZABETH LLC, JOHN WESOLOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
