Cases 11 - 20 of 64
Hicks et al v. Cantrell et al
as 3:2022cv00746
Plaintiff:
Grant Hicks, Tristan Nixon and Lucas Mario Nutt
Defendant:
Wesley Cantrell, Jonathan Fenoy, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Howard v. Bowens et al
as 3:2022cv00310
Plaintiff:
Lezzerio Howard
Defendant:
Daphne Bowens and Lee Ann Hamblin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ardoin v. Bowens et al
as 2:2022cv02255
Petitioner:
Kevin Ardoin
Respondent:
Warden Bowens, Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baxter v. Berwangner et al
as 2:2022cv02239
Plaintiff:
Robert Baxter
Defendant:
J. Berwangner, F/N/U Flowers, Warden Bowens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Maxwell v. CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT) et al
as 2:2022cv02033
Plaintiff:
Kyle Maxwell
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS (MEMPHIS POLICE DEPARTMENT), Shannon Bowen, Alvin Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Mullins v. City of Murfreesboro, et al.
as 3:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Bill Doe, Chief Michael Bowen and others
Plaintiff:
Tina Mullins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00237
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McChristion v. Easley Transportation, LLC et al
as 2:2020cv02121
Plaintiff:
Farlisha McChristion
Defendant:
Easley Transportation, LLC and Keith Bowen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00978
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
