Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Sayman v. Hutchens Law Firm, LP et al
as 3:2016cv00005
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Sayman
Defendant:
Hutchens Law Firm, LP, Goddard & Peterson, PLLC, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nautilus Insurance Company v. Smoky Mtn Construction Co. et al
as 2:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Nautilus Insurance Company
Defendant:
Smoky Mtn Construction Co., Patrick Bray and Margaret O'Bannion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00276
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Ward v. Carolyn W. Colvin
as 5:2014cv00001
Plaintiff:
Felecia Bray Ward
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
WARREN v. MCGEOUGH et al
as 1:2013cv01145
Plaintiff:
TINIKA S. WARREN
Defendant:
LETITIA MCGEOUGH, GARY RASHAWN SCALES and SUSAN E. BRAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
WARREN v. BRAY et al
as 1:2013cv01144
Plaintiff:
TINIKA S. WARREN
Defendant:
SUSAN E. BRAY, LETITIA MCGEOUGH and GARY RASHAWN SCALES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burney v. Bray et al
as 5:2013ct03049
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Burney, Jr.
Defendant:
D.W. Bray, North Carolina Prisoner Legal Services, Inc., Office of Indigent Defense Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bray v. Brown-Tomlinson et al
as 5:2013ct03029
Plaintiff:
William Bray
Defendant:
Tresa Brown-Tomlinson, Thomas Lewin and Carlton B. Joyner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burney v. Bray
as 5:2013ct03002
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Burney, Jr.
Defendant:
D.W. Bray
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BENTON et al v. OMTRON USA, LLC D/B/A TOWNSENDS
as 1:2011cv00840
Plaintiff:
JOHN BENTON , SUZANNE BENTON , WALLACE BARBOUR and others
Receiver:
JON A NANCE
Defendant:
OMTRON USA, LLC D/B/A TOWNSENDS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
