Cases 11 - 20 of 30
Andrews et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2021cv02143
Plaintiff:
Killian Andrews, Manuel Arevalo, George Ashford and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Webb v. Warden, FCC Coleman 1
as 5:2021cv00475
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman 1
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Webb-El v. Executive Branch, et al
as 20-1421
Respondent / Appellee:
MICHAEL CARVAJAL, Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT, WILLIAM BARR, United States Attorney General and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH BRYAN WEBB-EL
Webb-El v. Executive Branch of the of the Government et al
as 1:2020cv02573
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-El
Respondent:
Executive Branch of the of the Government, J. A. Barnhart, Michael D. Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
WEBB v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv60398
Plaintiff:
BRYAN WEBB
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC)Webb v. Llamas et al
as 1:2020cv00725
Defendant:
J. D. Fugate, D. Saucedo, P. Llamas and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Webb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ethosenergy Light Turbines, LLC v. Turbine Efficiency Group Ltd. et al
as 4:2019cv03431
Defendant:
Gas Turbine Applications, Inc., Michael Wood, Turbine Efficiency Group Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Ethosenergy Light Turbines, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Webb-El v. United States Parole
as 19-1326
Petitioner / Appellant:
KEITH BRYAN WEBB-EL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES PAROLE COMMISSION
Webb-El v. Stancil
as 1:2019cv01842
Petitioner:
Keith Bryan Webb-El
Respondent:
M.A. Stancil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Keith Webb v. Warden Allenwood USP
as 19-2110
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH BRYAN WEBB and KEITH BRYAN WEBB-EL
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN ALLENWOOD USP
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
