Cases 11 - 20 of 84
Full Circle Villagebrook GP, LLC v. Protech 2004-D, LLC, et al
as 23-2974
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FULL CIRCLE VILLAGEBROOK GP, LLC, an Illinois limited liability company
Defendant / Appellee:
PROTECH 2004-D, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company, AMTAX HOLDINGS 436, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company and ALDEN TORCH FINANCIAL LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Moke America LLC v. Moke USA, LLC
as 23-1720
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Defendant / Appellant:
MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Defendant:
AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation
Not Yet Classified:
MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
3Rd Party Defendant:
BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited
as 23-1675
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Appellee:
MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation and MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3Rd Party Defendant:
BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
Integrated Sports Media and Entertainment PPV, LLC v. One Palm Group, LLC, et al
as 23-55604
Plaintiff / Appellee:
INTEGRATED SPORTS MEDIA AND ENTERTAINMENT PPV, LLC, a Nevada Limited Liability Company
Defendant / Appellant:
ONE PALM GROUP, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, GROVER HENRY COLIN NIX IV, an individual and CROWN STONE PARTNERS, INC., a California corporation
Defendant:
LIVECAST 365, LLC, an Ohio Limited Liability Company, TIMOTHY BRILL DEVORE, an individual and CHARLES CHUCK LANG, Jr., an individual
Counter Defendant:
STANLEY STEPHEN HUNTSMAN and TONY MARTINEZ
Moke America LLC v. Moke International Limited
as 23-1634
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MOKE AMERICA LLC, a New York limited liability company
Appellant:
MOKE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Defendant:
AMERICAN CUSTOM GOLF CARS, INC., a California corporation and MOKE USA, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
3Rd Party Defendant:
BLACK AND WHITE CORPORATIONS I-X, ABC PARTNERSHIPS I-X, JOHN & JANE DOES I-X and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Dieomatic Incorporated v. General Aluminum Mfg. LLC
as 1:2023cv00522
Plaintiff:
Dieomatic Incorporated an Iowa corporation doing business as Cosma Casting Michigan
Defendant:
General Aluminum Mfg. LLC an Ohio limited liability company doing business as General Aluminum Mfg. Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Carlucci v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC et al
as 3:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Michelle Carlucci
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC, Schindler Elevator Corporation and Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC an Ohio limited liability company doing business as Macy's
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ELI Investments, LLC v. Corcoran Group, LLC
as 3:2023ms00004
Plaintiff:
ELI Realty Investments, LLC, Exclusive Lifestyles SoCal, LLC, a California limited liability company, Exclusive Lifestyles San Francisco, Inc., a California corporation and others
Defendant:
Corcoran Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
ELI Realty Investments, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company et al v. Corcoran Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
as 1:2023at00110
Plaintiff:
ELI Realty Investments, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, Exclusive Lifestyles SoCal, LLC, a California limited liability company, Exclusive Lifestyles San Francisco, Inc., a California corporation and others
Defendant:
Corcoran Group LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Receiver:
Jeremy W. Faith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
