Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Robinson v. City of Clanton, Alabama et al
as 2:2018cv00041
Plaintiff:
Carla Robinson
Defendant:
City of Clanton, Alabama, County of Chilton, Alabama , Darrell Bone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bone v. Alabama, State of
as 5:2017cv01403
Petitioner:
Patrick Lee Bone
Respondent:
Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Birmingham Bone and Joint Surgeons, PC v. Gilman Health Care Solutions LLC
as 2:2017cv00288
Plaintiff:
Birmingham Bone and Joint Surgeons, PC
Defendant:
Gilman Health Care Solutions LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv01919
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
United States of America v. Bone et al
as 4:2016cv01806
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Andrew J Bone, Sr, Connie C Bone, Exchange Bank of Alabama, The and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7403
Davis v. Bone (JOINT ASSIGN)(MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00010
Plaintiff:
Sadaka Davis
Defendant:
Derrick Bone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilhite v. Franklin et al
as 5:2014cv01547
Plaintiff:
Joey Lee Wilhite
Defendant:
Anne Franklin, Mardis, S Hazen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bone v. Thomas, et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00419
Plaintiff:
Gregory Rogers Bone
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas, Robert Bentley and Gary Hetzel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company v. Garland et al
as 2:2011cv00804
Plaintiff:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Sandra Garland , Marianna Radiology, Southern Bone & Joint Specialist and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
Michelle Parkin
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
Sandra Garland
Counter_claimant:
Sandra Garland
Counter_defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1395
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
