Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Brienza v. City of Peachtree City, Georgia et al
as 3:2017cv00134
Plaintiff:
Tyler L. Brienza
Defendant:
City of Peachtree City, Georgia, Adam C. Wadsworth and Mark A. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRRAM, INC. et al v. UNITED STATES FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) et al
as 3:2014cv02686
Plaintiff:
BRRAM, INC. , HOLLY BUSSEY , WILLIAM LYNCH and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA), THE MERCER COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS and FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321
MORAN v. GOLDFARB et al
as 2:2012mc00301
Plaintiff:
H. THOMAS MORAN , III
Defendant:
MORTON GOLDFARB, PATRICK ROTH, CATHERINE BRIENZA and others
Brienza v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2012cv02075
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Brienza
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brienza v. The Long Island Railroad Company
as 1:2012cv02001
Plaintiff:
Joseph Brienza
Defendant:
The Long Island Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Big Top Koolers, Inc. et al v. Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00256
Plaintiff:
Big Top Koolers, Inc. and Nicholas C. Brienza
Defendant:
Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
Big Top Koolers, Inc. et al v. Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
as 1:2010mc00257
Plaintiff:
Big Top Koolers, Inc. and Nicholas C. Brienza
Defendant:
Circus-Man Snacks, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1821 Default of Loan by Promissary Note
Moran et al v. Morton Goldfarb et al
as 1:2009cv07667
Plaintiff:
H. Thomas Moran, II, Disp. LLC, Edward T. Stein Associates, Ltd and others
Defendant:
Morton Goldfarb, Robert Goldman, Robert G. Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brienza v. Gee et al
as 8:2007cv00487
Plaintiff:
Daniel Brienza
Defendant:
David Gee and Ira Bridwell
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
