Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Best Western International Incorporated v. Bright LLC et al
as 2:2016cv00453
Plaintiff:
Best Western International Incorporated
Defendant:
Bright LLC and Jayesh Koshiya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez #147145 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01164
Plaintiff:
Angel Javier Ramirez
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, Unknown Banuelos-Encinas, Unknown McClellan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scharf et al v. Trabucco et al
as 3:2014cv08183
Plaintiff:
Helen Scharf , Karen Bright and Randall Scharf
Defendant:
Arnaldo Trabucco, Institute of Urology LLC, PHC-Fort Mohave Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hatfield v. Hatfield et al
as 2:2014cv01844
Plaintiff:
Donald J Hatfield
Defendant:
Shelly E Hatfield, Estate of Linda C ONeal, Jerry P Weiers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bright v. Colvin
as 3:2013cv08087
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Plaintiff:
James Bright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv08164
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
CtLumination LLC v. Super Bright LEDs Incorporated
as 2:2011cv00792
Plaintiff:
CtLumination LLC
Defendant:
Super Bright LEDs Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rosenfield et al v. Accessory Power, Bright Ideas Incorporated et al
as 4:2010cv00519
Plaintiff:
Joshua S Rosenfield and JLab Audio LLC
Defendant:
Accessory Power, Bright Ideas Incorporated, Electronic Express Incorporated and Bytech Ny Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv02196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Bright Now Dental, Inc.
as 2:2009mc00091
Petitioner:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Respondent:
Bright Now Dental, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
