Cases 11 - 20 of 88
Wisconsin Central Ltd v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
as 1:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Wisconsin Central Ltd, Illinois Central Railroad Company, Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company and others
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151 Railway Labor Act
Alton & Southern Railway Company, et al v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Divisi
as 22-7044
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Alton & Southern Railway Company, Belt Railway Company of Chicago, Bessemer & Lake Erie Railroad Company and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp. d/b/a METRA v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05988
Plaintiff:
Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corp. d/b/a METRA and Northeast Illinois Regional Commuter Rail Corporation
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Alliance of Police, Chapter 267
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BNSF Railway Company v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen et al
as 1:2021cv05965
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers - Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 1:2021cv05676
Plaintiff:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT and Brotherhood of Maintenance of way Employes Division/IBT Engineers and Trainmen
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers-Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05622
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Co. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Transportation Division et al
as 1:2021cv05502
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
Defendant:
International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail & Transportation Workers, Transportation Division, Roy Davis, Luke EDINGTON and others
Petitioner:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
ALBERS et al v. SIMPSON et al
as 4:2021cv11834
Plaintiff:
DENNIS R. ALBERS, DALE E. BOGART, JR., TONY D. CARDWELL and others
Defendant:
FREDDIE N. SIMPSON, DAVID D. JOYNT, BRUCE G. GLOVER and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
American Train Dispatchers As, et al v. National Railway Labor Confer, et al
as 21-7029
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Transportation Communications Union - IAM, Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division/IBT, Transport Workers Union and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, BNSF Railway Company, Kansas City Southern Railway Company and others
Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
as 8:2020cv00516
Defendant:
Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Division of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters
Plaintiff:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
