Cases 11 - 20 of 136
Clay v. Michigan Department of Corrections
as 2:2021cv11880
Plaintiff:
Latreesa Clay
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Jodi L Angelo, Sherri Sankey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay #219721 v. Jackson
as 1:2021cv00163
Petitioner:
Homer Robert Clay #219721
Respondent:
Shane Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clay v. Bailey et al
as 1:2020cv01200
Defendant:
Paul L. Bailey, E. Kuhl, Celena Herbert and others
Plaintiff:
John Clay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clay v. Bailey et al
as 1:2020cv00946
Defendant:
Unknown Burks, Celina Herbert and L. Paul Bailey
Plaintiff:
John Clay, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2020cv12488
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Marcus Clay Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Dale Martens Nissan Subaru, Inc. et al v. Yazaki Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv10161
Plaintiff:
Dale Martens Nissan Subaru, Inc., Green Team of Clay Center, Inc., McGrath Automotive Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Yazaki Corporation, Yazaki North America, Inc., Nippon Seiki Co., Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Clay v. Haga et al
as 1:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Tyler Poireir, Emily Eaton, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jerry Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson et al v. General Motors LLC et al
as 1:2019cv11349
Plaintiff:
Shane Christensen, T & T Specialty Applicators, LLC, Mahlon Bauman and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC, Robert Bosch GmbH and Robert Bosch LLC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Faber v. Smith
as 1:2019cv00964
Defendant:
Terrare Smith, Terrance Smith, USA and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Andy Faber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Chapman et al v. General Motors LLC
as 2:2019cv12333
Plaintiff:
Gary Godwin, Clay Kincheloe, Tim Taylor and others
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.