Cases 11 - 20 of 2,063
Clay v. Lycoming County Prison et al
as 4:2021cv01415
Plaintiff:
Tashi Clay
Defendant:
Lycoming County Prison and Corrections Officer Emrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARTER v. MURRAY et al
as 2:2021cv03289
Plaintiff:
REGINALD CARTER
Defendant:
DONNA M. MURRAY, ANDREW W. LUND, DENISE CLAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cortes v. The City of Philadelphia et al
as 2:2021cv00115
Defendant:
Police Officer Leible, Police Officer Myers, Police Officer Tirodo and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Cortes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Barnette et al v. LAWRENCE et al
as 2:2020cv05477
Plaintiff:
Kathy Barnette and Clay D Breece
Defendant:
KENNETH E. LAWRENCE, JR., Frank Dean and Valerie A Arkoosh
Intervenor Defendant:
DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE and PENNSYLVANIA DEMOCRATIC PARTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Luther et al
as 1:2020cv01621
Defendant:
Sec. Wetzel, Perrigo(R) Manufacturer, Clay Pharmaceutical and others
Plaintiff:
Lavon Cecil Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CLAY v. UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
as 2:2020cv00130
Plaintiff:
GLENDA E. CLAY
Defendant:
UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PHILLIPS v. OBERLANDER et al
as 1:2019cv00382
Defendant:
NURSE MURRAY, LIEUTENANT S.A. GATTO, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER RUSSELL and others
Plaintiff:
CURTIS CLAY PHILLIPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04302
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cope et al v. A.I.I Acquisitions, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv00728
Defendant:
Kolmar Laboratories, Inc., Unimin Corporation, Uniroyal, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Loretta Belac and Faith Belac Cope
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1452
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
