Cases 11 - 20 of 151
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 1:2022cv00940
Plaintiff:
Henry Christopher Stubbs, III
Defendant:
Gregory A. Skrepenak, Todd Vonderheid, Stephen A. Urban and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HORELL et al v. THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2022cv00787
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER HORELL, GORDON D. BROWN and HATEM M. HASSAN
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, SEAN STUMPF, PHIL LERZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00563
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
WELTY v. ANDERSON et al
as 2:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WELTY
Defendant:
MR. ANDERSON, MR. LONG, MR. CONNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
STUBBS v. SKREPENAK et al
as 2:2022cv00889
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
GREGORY A. SKREPENAK, TODD VONDERHEID, STEPHEN A. URBAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MULLER et al v. CONNER et al
as 2:2021cv05623
Plaintiff:
PAUL MULLER and BEVERLY MULLER
Defendant:
JOHN CONNER and LORI BRAENDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C. v. FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES, P.C.
as 2:2021cv01580
Plaintiff:
STEVEN A. CONNER DPM, P.C.
Defendant:
FOX REHABILITATION SERVICES, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Landis v. Ebbert et al
as 1:2021cv00244
Defendant:
M. Condit, J. Konkle, J. Sienkiewicz and others
Plaintiff:
Carlton Theodore Landis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
CONNER v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv03045
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
ELLEN CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carey v. Weaver et al
as 4:2020cv00929
Defendant:
C Weaver, Unknown Tutino, J Hart and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
