Cases 11 - 20 of 257
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Tilley v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management LLC
as 2:2013cv00077
Plaintiff:
Jason Tilley
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv06971
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2012cv61963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
GENTNER v. CREDITORS INTERCHANGE RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT, LLC et al
as 2:2012cv04906
Plaintiff:
ALBERT GENTNER
Defendant:
CREDITORS INTERCHANGE RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT, LLC and BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv22819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Griffin v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
as 1:2012cv11411
Plaintiff:
David W Griffin
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Nicholson v. Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
as 2:2012cv03503
Defendant:
Creditors Interchange Receivable Management, LLC
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nicholson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
