Cases 11 - 20 of 5,066
CMP Products Limited v. Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC et al
as 4:2017cv02194
Plaintiff:
CMP Products Limited
Defendant:
Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC and Cooper Industries, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Gorton et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv01110
Defendant:
Borgwarner Morse TEC, General Refractories Company, Ingersoll-Rand Company and others
Cross Defendant:
American Refractories, Pfizer, Inc., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and others
Cross Claimant:
Georgia-Pacific, LLC, Honeywell International, Inc., Bayer Cropscience, LP and others
Amicus Curiae:
Rhonda J. Gorton
Special Master:
Judge Russell M. Nigro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
FEND v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2017cv01701
Plaintiff:
JANE FEND
Defendant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AURORA PUMP , BELL HELICOPTERS and others
Cross_claimant:
ROLLS ROYCE CORPORATION , CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC. , GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY and others
Cross_defendant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY , AURORA PUMP , BELL HELICOPTERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RHOADES v. ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY et al
as 2:2016cv05844
Cross Defendant:
BEAZER EAST, IMO INDUSTRIES, INC., LEONA V. RHOADES and others
Defendant:
ALLEN-BRADLEY COMPANY, ALLEN-SHERMAN-HOFF, ARVIN MERITOR and others
Counter Claimant:
BASIC, INC.
Cross Claimant:
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, HONEYWELL, INC., INGERSOLL-RAND & CO. and others
Respondent:
UNITED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Asbestos Litigation
DMJ Associates, L.L.C. v. Capasso
as 16-3435
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant:
DMJ Associates, L.L.C., AKA DMJ Associates, L.L.C.
Def-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Exxon Mobil Corporation and Quanta Resource Corporation
Defendant-Counter-Claimant:
Clairol, Incorporated, Basf Corporation, Powell Duffryn Terminals, Inc. and others
Third-Party-Plaintiff:
Paribas North America
Third-Party-Defendant:
EQ Northeast, Inc., AKA Franklin Environmental Services, Inc., FKA Franklin Pumping Service, Coastal Oil New York, Inc, Alcan Aluminum Corporation, AKA Alcan Sheet & Plate and others
Defendant:
Carl A. Capasso, Darling International, Inc., Russell W. Mahler and others
Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC v. City of Syracuse, New York et al
as 5:2016cv01201
Plaintiff:
Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, New York and County of Onondaga, New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Janya Sawyer v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 16-1530
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JANYA SAWYER, Representative of the Estate of Joseph W. Morris, GARNETTE MORRIS, Individually and as Surviving Spouse of Joseph W. Morris, NANCY PIKE, Surviving Child of Joseph W. Morris and others
Defendant - Appellant:
FOSTER WHEELER LLC
Defendant:
UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, f/k/a Crane Packing Company, OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY, f/k/a Owens-Illinois, Incorporated and others
Third Party Defendant:
GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY, MANVILLE TRUST PERSONAL INJURY SETTLEMENT TRUST and others
State of New York et al v. Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC et al
as 5:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
State of New York and Basil Seggos
Defendant:
Cooper Crouse-Hinds, LLC , Eaton Corporation , General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Joyce Barlow v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2248
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JOYCE BARLOW
Defendant - Appellant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Clara Mosko v. Colgate Palmolive Company
as 15-2252
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CLARA G. MOSKO
Defendant - Appellant:
COLGATE PALMOLIVE COMPANY
Defendant:
JOHN CRANE-HOUDAILLE, INCORPORATED, E.L. STEBBING & COMPANY, INCORPORATED, HAMPSHIRE INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED, f/k/a John H. Hampshire Company and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
