Cases 11 - 20 of 469
Camilo Ruiz v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21787
Plaintiff:
Andres Camilo Ruiz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Trochez, Camilo J. v. Warden Heuett et al
as 1:2024cv21496
Plaintiff:
Camilo Josue Trochez
Defendant:
Warden Heuett and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Vargas-Nino, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2160
Petitioner:
CRISTIAN CAMILO VARGAS-NINO, LINA YISSEL BARON-SAAVEDRA, NIKOLAS VARGAS-BARON and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Lopez v. Thunderbird Restaurants LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Jossue Camilo Guerrero Lopez
Defendant:
Thunderbird Restaurants LLC, TB Ventures LLC, Ace High Partners LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Riddenhour v. City of Mount Vernon et al
as 7:2024cv02055
Plaintiff:
Lawsen Riddenhour and Lawson Riddenhour
Defendant:
City of Mount Vernon, City of Mount Vernon Police Department, County of Westchester Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01544
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Camargo Rincon, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1376
Petitioner:
CAMILO ANDRE CAMARGO RINCON, CLAUDIA MARCELA SANCHEZ-GUZMAN and ANDRES SANTIAGO CAMARGO-SANCHEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
USA v. Camilo Vargas
as 24-10348
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CAMILO ANDRES LANDAZUI VARGAS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
