Cases 11 - 20 of 71
Mendoza Velasquez v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2020cv22992
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General and Secretary D.H.S.
Plaintiff:
Juan Carlos Mendoza Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rudolfo Gill v. Charlene Crockett, et al
as 20-50582
Defendant / Appellee:
M. Gutierrez, Correctional Officer, Kimbery Grist, Correctional Officer IV, Ms. Pepi, Correctional Officer V and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Rudolfo Gill
MENDOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv10070
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv04689
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Gill v. Alexander et al
as 2:2020cv00115
Respondent:
Kailey Smiles, Ms. FNU Murrack, Robert D Coffey and others
Plaintiff:
Rudolfo Gill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MENDOZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv16767
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CARLOS MENDOZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gil v. Crockett et al
as 4:2020cv00011
Defendant:
Unknown Black Female Lt., Jeremy Chance, Latisha Baraka and others
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo Gil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena Abreu v. White Star NYC Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00835
Plaintiff:
Isael Domingo Pena Abreu
Defendant:
Carlos Mendoza and White Star NYC Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Kruppenbacher v. Annuci et al
as 1:2020cv00071
Defendant:
John Doe # 9 Correctional Officer, Thomas R. Griffin, Christopher A. Batista and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kruppenbacher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Carlos Mendoza Serrato
as 19-3739
Defendant / Appellant:
Carlos Mendoza Serrato
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
