Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Cruz v. El Regreso, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv02676
Plaintiff:
Marlene A. Cruz
Defendant:
El Regreso, Inc., Louis Medina and Carlos Pagan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Quiles-Torres, et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance
as 12-2308
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MAGDALENA CARABALLO, ELIEZER CRUZ-APONTE, PETRA RAMOS AMARO and others
Defendant:
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC, CARIBBEAN OIL LP, CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM LP and others
Defendant / Appellee:
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, f/k/a Liberty International Underwriters, Inc.
Quiles-Torres, et al v. Caribbean Petroleum Refining,, et al
as 12-2308
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAGDALENA CARABALLO, ELIEZER CRUZ-APONTE, PETRA RAMOS AMARO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM REFINING, L. P., INPECOS A. G., FIRST OIL INTERNATIONAL and others
Defendant:
ROYAL DUTCH SHELL PLC, CARIBBEAN OIL LP, CARIBBEAN PETROLEUM LP and others
Hamilton v. City of Portland Fire and Rescue et al
as 3:2010cv00309
Defendant:
B. Christensen, City of Portland, City of Portland Fire and Rescue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rodgriguez v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2009cv00850
Plaintiff:
Israel Rodgriguez
Defendant:
City of Portland, Carlos Pagan, Robert Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pagan-Lopez v. Mage-Soto et al
as 3:2009cv01546
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pagan-Lopez
Defendant:
Mildred Mage-Soto and Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pagan-Lopez v. Mage-Soto et al
as 3:2009cv01080
Plaintiff:
Carlos Pagan-Lopez
Defendant:
Mildred Mage-Soto, Antonio Sagardia and Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01787
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
