Cases 11 - 20 of 35
ARD et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv04378
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM ARD , MARTHA ARD , WILLIAM BANKS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE and NFL PROPERTIES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BROWN v. SUPT. GERALD ROZUM et al
as 3:2011cv00176
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. BROWN
Defendant:
SUPT. GERALD ROZUM and MARLENE ENEDY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44612
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. BROWN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Lucarelli v. Brown
as 3:2011cv01388
Plaintiff:
Charles Lucarelli
Defendant:
Charles C Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv37323
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A. BROWN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
BROWNING v. THE CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv63782
Plaintiff:
CHARLES EDWARD BROWNING and MARY TYLER BROWNING
Defendant:
THE CELOTEX CORPORATION , GAF CORPORATION , OWENS CORNING FIBERGLAS CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole et al
as 3:2011cv00443
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Brown
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole , Six Unknown Proxy Agents and SCI Coal Parole Dept.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown v. Camp Hill et al
as 3:2010cv02612
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Camp Hill, Central Office Executive Staff, William D. Sprenkle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51338
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R BROWN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
BROWN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73431
Plaintiff:
CHARLES R. BROWN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
