Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Lowe v Monsanto
as 6:2020cv00034
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowe
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LOWE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv10621
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LOWE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lowe v. NBT Bank, N.A.
as 3:2019cv01400
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowe
Defendant:
NBT Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Christopher Lowe v. Lifestyle Publications, LLC, et al
as 8:2019cv00198
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowe, Gregory Yee, Ansley Allen and others
Defendant:
Does 1 to 100, inclusive and Lifestyle Publications, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Abdeljabbar et al v. Lyft, Inc.
as 3:2018cv07482
Plaintiff:
Odeh Abdeljabbar, Eder Berganza, Dexter Baldridge II and others
Defendant:
Lyft, Inc.
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC v. ARP Wave, LLC
as 8:2018cv01890
Defendant:
ARP Wave, LLC
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Chavez v. Show Low, City of et al
as 3:2018cv08147
Defendant:
Mike Allsop, Joe Shelly, Kaneesah Willer and others
Plaintiff:
Caleb C Chavez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC v. Medtrainer, Inc. et al
as 8:2016cv01081
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC
Defendant:
Medtrainer, Inc. and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC v. National Pen Co. LLC et al
as 8:2014cv02657
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC
Defendant:
National Pen Co. LLC , National Pen Holdings, LLC and John Does
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC v. Pure Biomed LLC et al
as 8:2014cv02118
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lowe Hicklin DC PLC
Defendant:
Pure Biomed LLC and John Does
Cause Of Action: Restrictions on Use of Telephone Equipment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
