Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Jarrett Hamilton v. City of New Albany, Indiana, et al
as 16-3901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JARRETT HAMILTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW ALBANY, INDIANA, PAUL SPEIGHTS, DAVID BREWER and others
HAMILTON v. NEW ALBANY et al
as 4:2015cv00041
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT, FLOYD COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, FLOYD COUNTY, INDIANA and others
Plaintiff:
JARRETT HAMILTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
DOLON v. CITY OF NEW ALBANY
as 4:2013cv00198
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW ALBANY
Plaintiff:
JILL DOLON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
WINFORD v. WHITLOW et al
as 4:2013cv00161
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY, CITY OF NEW ALBANY and KEITH WHITLOW
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE WINFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00024
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Graham v. Wilson et al
as 1:2011cv00173
Plaintiff:
Tommica Graham
Defendant:
Gabe Wilson and The City of New Albany, Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BLAIR v. THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NEW ALBANY
as 4:2009cv00097
Plaintiff:
TONI BLAIR
Defendant:
THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF NEW ALBANY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATTINGLY et al v. CITY OF NEW ALBANY
as 4:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
JOHN MATTINGLY, JOHN MATTINGLY, SAMANTHA MORRIS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW ALBANY
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MOSS et al v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 4:2008cv00141
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE MOSS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF INDIANA, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
